🚀 Limited-time offer! Now through August 6, everyone gets double the access — research case law, set up docket alerts, and verify citations right inside your favorite AI assistant. Learn how with our MCP server. Enjoying the extra access? Become a member!

Become a Member

Mazza v. Robinhood Markets, Inc. (3:26-cv-05610)

District Court, N.D. California

Items on this page are sourced from PACER and RECAP and may not be up to date. Learn more about our coverage.

Date Filed
Description
 

17

July 21, 2026

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Deadline to Respond to Complaint filed by Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Markets, Inc.. (Barrera, Abigail) (Filed on 7/21/2026) (Entered: 07/21/2026)

Main Doc

Stipulation and Proposed Order

18

July 21, 2026

Corporate Disclosure Statement by Robinhood Derivatives, LLC, Robinhood Markets, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Robinhood Markets, Inc. for Robinhood Derivatives, LLC. and Certification of Conflicts, Interested Entities and Persons, and Citizenships (Barrera, Abigail) (Filed on 7/21/2026) (Entered: 07/21/2026)

Main Doc

Certificate of Interested Entities, Corporate Disclosure Statement, or Rule 7.1 Disclosures

19

July 22, 2026

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE IT IS ORDERED that this case is reassigned using a proportionate, random and blind system pursuant to General Order No. 44 to Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin. Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse no longer assigned to the case. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear the updated judicial initials immediately after the case number. Counsel are reminded to verify the location of the judge on the court website. All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule. Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also remain unchanged. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Mark B. Busby Clerk, United States District Court (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (as, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2026) (Entered: 06/29/2026)

Main Doc

20

July 22, 2026

CLERK'S NOTICE ON REASSIGNMENT. You are noticed that the Court has scheduled an Initial Case Management Conference before Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin upon reassignment. For a copy of Judge Martinez-Olguin's Standing Order and other information, please refer to the Court's website at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges/martinez-olguin-araceli-amo/. Joint Case Management Statement due by 9/17/2026 no later than 12:00 PM PST. Initial Case Management Conference set for 9/24/2026 10:00 AM in Oakland, Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor.Court Appearances: Advanced notice for main speaker is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A joint list of names must be sent to the CRD at AMOCRD@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 9/21/2026 at 12:00 PM PST. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(jlg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2026) (Entered: 7/22/2026)

Main Doc

21

July 22, 2026

ORDER RELATING CASES. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/29/2026. (vla, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2026) (Entered: 7/22/2026)

Main Doc

Order Relating Case

22

July 22, 2026

ORDER REASSIGNING CASE IT IS ORDERED that this case is directly assigned to Judge Edward M Chen. Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin no longer assigned to the case. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear the updated judicial initials immediately after the case number. Counsel are reminded to verify the location of the judge on the court website. All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule. Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also remain unchanged. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order 65 and cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Mark B. Busby Clerk, United States District Court (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (tke, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/29/2026) (Entered: 7/22/2026)

Main Doc

Newsletter

Sign up to receive the Free Law Project newsletter with tips and announcements.